IN PARTNERSHIP WITH

Something historic is happening in plain sight. And most Americans don’t even realize it.

FedNow isn’t just a payment system. It’s the dry run for a future where cash no longer exists—where every move you make with your money is monitored, approved, or blocked by Washington.

Trump has called it out for what it is: a Trojan Horse for the Digital Dollar.

Once this system is fully rolled out, nothing about your finances will be private. Your savings, your retirement, your everyday transactions—all visible, all traceable, all controllable.

But there’s still time to prepare.

You can legally move part of your nest egg into a form of shielding that stands outside of FedNow, the Digital Dollar, and whatever comes next.

Reagan Gold Group has created a free guide that reveals exactly how to do it—and why waiting could be the costliest mistake you’ll ever make.

As Washington grapples with Social Security's looming trust fund shortfall and persistent gaps in retirement coverage, a striking picture emerges from across the globe: other advanced economies have quietly built pension systems that combine broad participation, fiscal sustainability, and meaningful retirement security. Recent reports from the OECD, World Bank, and IMF reveal compelling lessons from countries that have successfully modernized their retirement frameworks while America's system faces mounting pressures.

The data tells a sobering story for the United States. While global pension assets reached $63 trillion by 2024, growing 8.5% across OECD countries, America confronts a Social Security deficit of $67 billion in 2024 alone—the fourth consecutive year of shortfalls. Against this backdrop, international experiences offer both inspiration and practical blueprints for reform.

Australia's Superannuation: The Power of Compulsion

Australia's transformation stands as perhaps the most compelling case study in modern pension reform. Since introducing mandatory employer contributions in 1992, the country has built a retirement system now worth $4.2 trillion—making it the world's fifth-largest pension market by assets. The superannuation guarantee, which reached 12% of wages in July 2025, demonstrates how gradual escalation can build substantial retirement wealth without economic disruption.

"The superannuation system has fundamentally changed how Australians prepare for retirement," noted Treasury Secretary Jim Chalmers in a September 2024 address to Parliament. Total contributions increased 14.8% to $198 billion in the year ending December 2024, while benefit payments rose 12% to $124 billion—indicating a maturing system that maintains robust inflows while supporting current retirees.

The Australian model's success lies in its universality and automation. Unlike America's voluntary 401(k) system, which creates stark disparities in coverage and contributions, Australia's mandatory framework ensures that virtually all workers accumulate retirement savings from age 18. This compulsory approach has proven particularly effective for lower-income workers who might otherwise lack access to employer-sponsored plans.

Europe's Multi-Pillar Innovation: Balance Through Diversity

European pension systems offer a different but equally valuable lesson: the power of combining guaranteed public benefits with funded private accounts. The Netherlands, completing its historic shift from defined benefit to defined contribution schemes by 2028, exemplifies this balanced approach. The Dutch system maintains a robust public pension (AOW) while requiring employer-sponsored occupational pensions covering 90% of workers.

Recent reforms in the Netherlands illustrate how countries can modernize pension systems while preserving essential protections. The Future Pensions Act, which became law in July 2024, shifts to contribution-based schemes while maintaining collective risk-sharing mechanisms. "The transition allows for more individual control while preserving the solidarity that has defined Dutch pensions," explained Klaas Knot, President of De Nederlandsche Bank, in a December 2024 interview with the Financial Times.

The UK's automatic enrollment experience provides another model for expanding coverage. Since implementing auto-enrollment in 2012, Britain has enrolled over 11 million workers into workplace pensions, with coverage rates exceeding 80% for full-time employees. The system's success stems from behavioral insights: making participation the default while allowing opt-outs, combined with graduated contribution increases that reached current minimums without triggering mass departures.

Japan's Savings Culture: Lessons in Financial Resilience

Japan offers a different perspective on retirement security through its combination of disciplined household saving and supplemental pension arrangements. Despite facing the world's most rapid population aging, Japan maintains relatively stable retirement income through high household savings rates and expanding individual pension accounts. The country's Individual-type Defined Contribution (iDeCo) plans have seen participation double since 2020, reaching new highs even as the population ages.

Research from the Bank of Japan highlights how cultural factors interact with policy design. "Japan's household saving behavior, while declining from historical peaks, continues to provide a buffer against aging pressures that many countries lack," noted BOJ economist Takeshi Kimura in a July 2024 research paper. This experience suggests that pension adequacy depends not just on system design but on broader patterns of financial behavior and household wealth accumulation.

Global Lessons for American Reform

These international experiences point toward several principles that could inform U.S. pension reform. First, automatic enrollment and escalation dramatically improve participation without eliminating choice—lessons directly applicable to expanding 401(k) coverage or creating new national savings accounts. Second, combining guaranteed minimum benefits with funded accounts can provide both security and growth potential, addressing concerns about Social Security's adequacy while building individual wealth.

Recent analysis from the World Bank emphasizes that successful pension reform requires comprehensive approaches. "The most effective reforms combine automatic features, reasonable contribution rates, and sound regulatory frameworks—lessons that apply across different economic and institutional contexts," concluded Gonzalo Reyes Hartley, World Bank pension specialist, in the organization's 2025 State of Social Protection report.

The IMF's July 2024 Global Financial Stability Note reinforces these themes, noting that pension systems with broad coverage and adequate funding contribute to both individual security and overall financial stability. For the United States, facing a Social Security trust fund exhaustion date of 2034, these lessons offer both urgency and opportunity.

Key Shifts in America’s Financial Landscape:



A Path Forward: Adaptation, Not Imitation

No country's pension system can be transplanted wholesale, but the international evidence suggests clear directions for American reform. The combination of Australia's mandatory contributions, Europe's multi-pillar structure, and lessons from automatic enrollment points toward a modernized system that could address coverage gaps while strengthening retirement security.

As Congress considers Social Security reform and retirement security more broadly, the global experience demonstrates that ambitious pension modernization is both feasible and necessary. Countries that have successfully adapted their systems share common features: broad coverage through automatic participation, adequate contribution rates, and balanced approaches that combine public and private elements. With Social Security facing a $67 billion annual deficit and growing, America can no longer afford to ignore these international lessons.

The question is not whether American retirement policy will change, but whether it will learn from the successes and innovations developed elsewhere. The evidence from abroad suggests that with political will and careful design, the United States could build a retirement system worthy of the 21st century—one that combines the best insights from Australia's universality, Europe's balance, and global experience with automatic enrollment and adequate benefits.

Deniss Slinkins,
Global Financial Journal

Keep Reading

No posts found